https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354874 The appeal was allowed after condoning the delay due to the appellant's health issues, with a cost imposed for the delay and negligent behavior. The Tribunal directed the application of a 10% gross profit ratio on cash deposits, recognizing the business nature of the transactions. Both appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, with the same rationale applied to identical issues in separate judgments. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:57:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354874 The appeal was allowed after condoning the delay due to the appellant's health issues, with a cost imposed for the delay and negligent behavior. The Tribunal directed the application of a 10% gross profit ratio on cash deposits, recognizing the business nature of the transactions. Both appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, with the same rationale applied to identical issues in separate judgments. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354874