<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 287 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354866</link>
    <description>The appellate authority upheld the demands for service tax amounts and penalties imposed on the appellant due to discrepancies in tax payments and declarations. The appellant failed to provide satisfactory explanations for the differences in figures, indicating a lack of intent to evade taxes. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurate declarations and compliance with tax regulations to prevent penalties for evasion or suppression of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:56:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 287 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354866</link>
      <description>The appellate authority upheld the demands for service tax amounts and penalties imposed on the appellant due to discrepancies in tax payments and declarations. The appellant failed to provide satisfactory explanations for the differences in figures, indicating a lack of intent to evade taxes. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurate declarations and compliance with tax regulations to prevent penalties for evasion or suppression of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>