<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 286 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354865</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, holding that the demand of interest on non-payment of service tax was hit by limitation and therefore not sustainable. The appeal against the interest and penalty imposed was allowed, with the impugned order being set aside. The decision was pronounced on 02.11.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 286 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354865</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, holding that the demand of interest on non-payment of service tax was hit by limitation and therefore not sustainable. The appeal against the interest and penalty imposed was allowed, with the impugned order being set aside. The decision was pronounced on 02.11.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>