<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 283 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354862</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Writ Appeal, upholding the order of the Writ Court and the Settlement Commission. The appellant&#039;s contentions were not accepted, and the comprehensive order of the Settlement Commission, including the duty liability on raw materials and the depreciation on capital goods, was affirmed. The court emphasized the finality and conclusiveness of the Settlement Commission&#039;s order and found no violation of principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 283 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354862</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Writ Appeal, upholding the order of the Writ Court and the Settlement Commission. The appellant&#039;s contentions were not accepted, and the comprehensive order of the Settlement Commission, including the duty liability on raw materials and the depreciation on capital goods, was affirmed. The court emphasized the finality and conclusiveness of the Settlement Commission&#039;s order and found no violation of principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>