<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 282 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s case unsubstantiated due to lack of corroborative evidence, inconsistencies in statements, and failure to examine relevant records. It set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals filed by the appellants. The Tribunal clarified that this decision does not extend to those who settled their cases before the Settlement Commission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 282 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s case unsubstantiated due to lack of corroborative evidence, inconsistencies in statements, and failure to examine relevant records. It set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals filed by the appellants. The Tribunal clarified that this decision does not extend to those who settled their cases before the Settlement Commission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>