<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 277 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalties due to insufficient evidence of clandestine removal. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of concrete proof of evasion. The judgment was pronounced in 2018, disposing of all appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:50:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 277 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalties due to insufficient evidence of clandestine removal. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of concrete proof of evasion. The judgment was pronounced in 2018, disposing of all appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>