https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198616 Revocation of an arbitrator's authority on alleged bias requires a real and reasonable likelihood of bias, assessed from the standpoint of a reasonable informed person, and the court must also be satisfied that refusal would cause substantial miscarriage of justice. Alleged remarks, without timely objection and in the context of ongoing participation, did not establish bias. Refusal to permit oral evidence, where supported by reasons based on the record and case management, did not by itself prove mala fides or partiality. Assertions of personal interest, removal in another matter, and challenge to the fee schedule also failed on the facts, leaving no ground to disqualify the arbitrator. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Feb 2018 18:15:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198616 Revocation of an arbitrator's authority on alleged bias requires a real and reasonable likelihood of bias, assessed from the standpoint of a reasonable informed person, and the court must also be satisfied that refusal would cause substantial miscarriage of justice. Alleged remarks, without timely objection and in the context of ongoing participation, did not establish bias. Refusal to permit oral evidence, where supported by reasons based on the record and case management, did not by itself prove mala fides or partiality. Assertions of personal interest, removal in another matter, and challenge to the fee schedule also failed on the facts, leaving no ground to disqualify the arbitrator. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198616