<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 551 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198594</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court Division Bench dismissed the probate application due to suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will, including the testatrix&#039;s physical and mental state, exclusion of heirs, signature inconsistencies, and lack of key witnesses. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, affirming the probate revocation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 551 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198594</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court Division Bench dismissed the probate application due to suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will, including the testatrix&#039;s physical and mental state, exclusion of heirs, signature inconsistencies, and lack of key witnesses. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, affirming the probate revocation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>