<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 706 - CEGAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the interpretation of duty-free Advance Licences for importing Polyester filament yarn. Despite allegations of mismatch in denierage specifications, the Tribunal found the imported yarn eligible for clearance against the licenses. Emphasizing commercial use and not requiring a close nexus between imported inputs and export products, the Tribunal set aside the order confiscating the goods and imposing fines. The decision highlighted that as long as the imported goods were of a kind known to be used in the export product, they met the requirements of the duty exemption scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 10:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 706 - CEGAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the interpretation of duty-free Advance Licences for importing Polyester filament yarn. Despite allegations of mismatch in denierage specifications, the Tribunal found the imported yarn eligible for clearance against the licenses. Emphasizing commercial use and not requiring a close nexus between imported inputs and export products, the Tribunal set aside the order confiscating the goods and imposing fines. The decision highlighted that as long as the imported goods were of a kind known to be used in the export product, they met the requirements of the duty exemption scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>