<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 259 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354838</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 and allowing the appeal. The Commissioner&#039;s contention that interest on a loan paid by the assessee&#039;s husband was not allowable under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act was rejected. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had diligently assessed the income, and there was no need to invoke section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 09:02:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 259 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354838</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 and allowing the appeal. The Commissioner&#039;s contention that interest on a loan paid by the assessee&#039;s husband was not allowable under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act was rejected. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had diligently assessed the income, and there was no need to invoke section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>