<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 76 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11748</link>
    <description>HC held that total sales cannot be treated as assessee&#039;s profit and the Tribunal&#039;s adoption of a net profit rate was not perverse. The court approved using a net profit rate (five percent) to estimate unrecorded credit sales and refused to enhance it, noting adequacy depends on case facts and that the applied rate, if anything, was generous. The Tribunal&#039;s approach therefore stood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 76 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11748</link>
      <description>HC held that total sales cannot be treated as assessee&#039;s profit and the Tribunal&#039;s adoption of a net profit rate was not perverse. The court approved using a net profit rate (five percent) to estimate unrecorded credit sales and refused to enhance it, noting adequacy depends on case facts and that the applied rate, if anything, was generous. The Tribunal&#039;s approach therefore stood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>