https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354822 The case involved the classification of imported coal as steam coal or bituminous coal for duty rate determination. Different CESTAT Benches had conflicting decisions on the issue, leading to a referral to the Larger Bench. The Larger Bench granted the appellants an opportunity to return after the pending Apex Court verdict. The department did not appeal the decision, allowing other Benches to dispose of appeals in line with the Larger Bench decision, remanding cases for further consideration post the Apex Court's ruling. The Tribunal set aside impugned orders and remanded matters for reconsideration in light of the pending Apex Court decision, ultimately dismissing miscellaneous applications for lack of merit. en-us Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Feb 2018 08:56:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354822 The case involved the classification of imported coal as steam coal or bituminous coal for duty rate determination. Different CESTAT Benches had conflicting decisions on the issue, leading to a referral to the Larger Bench. The Larger Bench granted the appellants an opportunity to return after the pending Apex Court verdict. The department did not appeal the decision, allowing other Benches to dispose of appeals in line with the Larger Bench decision, remanding cases for further consideration post the Apex Court's ruling. The Tribunal set aside impugned orders and remanded matters for reconsideration in light of the pending Apex Court decision, ultimately dismissing miscellaneous applications for lack of merit. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354822