https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354817 The High Court upheld the conviction and sentencing of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. The court found that the accused failed to provide evidence to support his defense of the cheque being issued as security for a tractor transaction, and did not rebut the legal presumption under Section 139 of the Act. The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court's decision based on the proper evaluation of evidence and application of the law, concluding that there were no grounds for revision. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Feb 2018 08:44:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354817 The High Court upheld the conviction and sentencing of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. The court found that the accused failed to provide evidence to support his defense of the cheque being issued as security for a tractor transaction, and did not rebut the legal presumption under Section 139 of the Act. The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court's decision based on the proper evaluation of evidence and application of the law, concluding that there were no grounds for revision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354817