<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund Allowed for Extra Payment Mistakenly Made as Penalty in Service Tax Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37829</link>
    <description>Refund of penalty - there was no need to pay penalty - the said amount was suo moto deposited by the respondent while discharging the service tax and interest, which in my view, cannot be designated or termed as penalty. At best, it could be considered as an extra payment made - refund allowed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 08:14:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 08:14:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund Allowed for Extra Payment Mistakenly Made as Penalty in Service Tax Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37829</link>
      <description>Refund of penalty - there was no need to pay penalty - the said amount was suo moto deposited by the respondent while discharging the service tax and interest, which in my view, cannot be designated or termed as penalty. At best, it could be considered as an extra payment made - refund allowed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 08:14:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>