https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354811 The tribunal upheld the rejection of the appellant's refund claim for service tax paid under "Renting of Immovable Property Services." It was determined that the property, leased for hotel business activities, did not solely serve residential purposes and was subject to service tax for both business/commerce and accommodation sections. The tribunal emphasized that the entire property, including all sections, was taxable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit, affirming the correctness of the duty payment and the rejection of the refund claim. en-us Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354811 The tribunal upheld the rejection of the appellant's refund claim for service tax paid under "Renting of Immovable Property Services." It was determined that the property, leased for hotel business activities, did not solely serve residential purposes and was subject to service tax for both business/commerce and accommodation sections. The tribunal emphasized that the entire property, including all sections, was taxable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit, affirming the correctness of the duty payment and the rejection of the refund claim. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354811