<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 229 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354808</link>
    <description>The appellant, engaged in installation services, disputed the Department&#039;s classification under the taxable category of &quot;Commissioning and Installation Service&quot; with service tax demand from 1.7.2003. The appellant argued they should only be liable from 16.6.2005 when the relevant entry was inserted. The court found the appellant&#039;s activities aligned with the amended definition effective from 16.6.2005 for &quot;installation of electrical and electronic devices.&quot; The demand was deemed unsustainable, the lower authorities&#039; decision was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 229 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354808</link>
      <description>The appellant, engaged in installation services, disputed the Department&#039;s classification under the taxable category of &quot;Commissioning and Installation Service&quot; with service tax demand from 1.7.2003. The appellant argued they should only be liable from 16.6.2005 when the relevant entry was inserted. The court found the appellant&#039;s activities aligned with the amended definition effective from 16.6.2005 for &quot;installation of electrical and electronic devices.&quot; The demand was deemed unsustainable, the lower authorities&#039; decision was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>