https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354806 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Rectification of Mistake (RoM) filed by the appellant due to an Advocate's alleged mistake in the final order. The Tribunal held that the arguments presented by the Advocate were already considered during proceedings and rejected the attempt to reinterpret the order post hoc. Emphasizing the maxim COMMODUM EX INJURIA SUA MEMO HABERE DEBET, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of upholding the integrity of legal proceedings and decisions. Trust in Counsels' arguments was acknowledged, but the Tribunal found no merit in the RoM, underscoring the need for accountability and accurate arguments for fair outcomes. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354806 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Rectification of Mistake (RoM) filed by the appellant due to an Advocate's alleged mistake in the final order. The Tribunal held that the arguments presented by the Advocate were already considered during proceedings and rejected the attempt to reinterpret the order post hoc. Emphasizing the maxim COMMODUM EX INJURIA SUA MEMO HABERE DEBET, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of upholding the integrity of legal proceedings and decisions. Trust in Counsels' arguments was acknowledged, but the Tribunal found no merit in the RoM, underscoring the need for accountability and accurate arguments for fair outcomes. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354806