<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 203 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354782</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the non-inclusion of royalty, bank, and LC opening charges in determining the assessable value of yarn for Central Excise duty liability. The appellant&#039;s argument that the proceedings were time-barred due to delayed issuance of the show cause notice was accepted. Despite the appellant&#039;s continuous engagement with the department on the disputed issues, the delay in issuing the notice rendered the proceedings time-barred. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the delay in the show cause notice issuance, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 07:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 203 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354782</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the non-inclusion of royalty, bank, and LC opening charges in determining the assessable value of yarn for Central Excise duty liability. The appellant&#039;s argument that the proceedings were time-barred due to delayed issuance of the show cause notice was accepted. Despite the appellant&#039;s continuous engagement with the department on the disputed issues, the delay in issuing the notice rendered the proceedings time-barred. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the delay in the show cause notice issuance, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>