<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 202 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354781</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of MS ingots without duty payment. The matter was remanded for verifying duty already paid by buyers and reexamining the sale of scrap adjustment. The appellant was given a chance to provide additional evidence, while penalty considerations were left open for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 07:07:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 202 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354781</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of MS ingots without duty payment. The matter was remanded for verifying duty already paid by buyers and reexamining the sale of scrap adjustment. The appellant was given a chance to provide additional evidence, while penalty considerations were left open for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>