<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 49 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11741</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the conveyance allowance/additional conveyance allowance received by Development Officers of LIC is exempt under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the Development Officers are not entitled to any deduction beyond the standard deduction under section 16 for the incentive bonus received, as the bonus is considered part of their salary. The appeals were allowed in part, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 49 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11741</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the conveyance allowance/additional conveyance allowance received by Development Officers of LIC is exempt under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the Development Officers are not entitled to any deduction beyond the standard deduction under section 16 for the incentive bonus received, as the bonus is considered part of their salary. The appeals were allowed in part, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>