<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1311 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198583</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that there would be no levy of service tax on indivisible works contracts executed between 10.9.2004 and 31.5.2007. However, for contracts made taxable from 1.6.2007 onwards, the appellant would be subject to Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994, for determining the value of services in the works contracts. The Tribunal also specified that if the appellant had opted for the composition scheme, the eligibility and fulfillment of conditions for the scheme would be examined. Penalties were not imposed due to confusion, and the appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded to the adjudicating authority with specific directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1311 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198583</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that there would be no levy of service tax on indivisible works contracts executed between 10.9.2004 and 31.5.2007. However, for contracts made taxable from 1.6.2007 onwards, the appellant would be subject to Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994, for determining the value of services in the works contracts. The Tribunal also specified that if the appellant had opted for the composition scheme, the eligibility and fulfillment of conditions for the scheme would be examined. Penalties were not imposed due to confusion, and the appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded to the adjudicating authority with specific directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>