<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1607 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198572</link>
    <description>Excess customs duty paid due to an importer&#039;s oversight in not claiming an available exemption notification may be refunded without first challenging the assessment, where classification and valuation are not in dispute. The earlier rule against bypassing a finally assessed bill of entry was held inapplicable on these facts because the excess arose from failure to claim Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. However, refund remains subject to unjust enrichment: the claimant must prove that the duty incidence was not passed on to any other person before disbursement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 07:04:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1607 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198572</link>
      <description>Excess customs duty paid due to an importer&#039;s oversight in not claiming an available exemption notification may be refunded without first challenging the assessment, where classification and valuation are not in dispute. The earlier rule against bypassing a finally assessed bill of entry was held inapplicable on these facts because the excess arose from failure to claim Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. However, refund remains subject to unjust enrichment: the claimant must prove that the duty incidence was not passed on to any other person before disbursement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>