https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11740 Unexplained delay of more than two years in challenging search and seizure proceedings weighed against interference under Article 226, and the existence of a pending statutory appeal made the appellate forum the proper place to pursue grievances. The Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction at that stage, noting that the block assessment had already been completed and the petitioner had an available remedy before the appellate authority. All contentions were directed to be raised in the pending appeal, and the writ petition was dismissed without examination of the merits. en-us Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11740 Unexplained delay of more than two years in challenging search and seizure proceedings weighed against interference under Article 226, and the existence of a pending statutory appeal made the appellate forum the proper place to pursue grievances. The Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction at that stage, noting that the block assessment had already been completed and the petitioner had an available remedy before the appellate authority. All contentions were directed to be raised in the pending appeal, and the writ petition was dismissed without examination of the merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11740