<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1285 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198587</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. Firstly, the assessee was deemed eligible for claiming deduction under Section 80IB(10) despite filing the return beyond the due date specified under Section 139(1) but within the extended period under Section 139(4). Secondly, the built-up area of the four residential units was found to be within the prescribed limit under Section 80IB(10) when terraces were excluded from the calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1285 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198587</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. Firstly, the assessee was deemed eligible for claiming deduction under Section 80IB(10) despite filing the return beyond the due date specified under Section 139(1) but within the extended period under Section 139(4). Secondly, the built-up area of the four residential units was found to be within the prescribed limit under Section 80IB(10) when terraces were excluded from the calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>