<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 42 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11735</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Department in an appeal against the setting aside of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the assessee&#039;s failure to pay collected sales tax rendered section 43B inapplicable, leading to the application of section 271(1)(c) for concealing trading receipts. Consequently, the penalty deletion was denied, and the appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 42 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11735</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Department in an appeal against the setting aside of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the assessee&#039;s failure to pay collected sales tax rendered section 43B inapplicable, leading to the application of section 271(1)(c) for concealing trading receipts. Consequently, the penalty deletion was denied, and the appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>