<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 182 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO not to treat any amount as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The loan transaction was deemed not to qualify as deemed dividend, as the provisions were found not applicable due to the absence of shareholding relationships between the parties. Additionally, there were no accumulated profits to consider the loan as deemed dividend after allowing depreciation as per Income Tax Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 182 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO not to treat any amount as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The loan transaction was deemed not to qualify as deemed dividend, as the provisions were found not applicable due to the absence of shareholding relationships between the parties. Additionally, there were no accumulated profits to consider the loan as deemed dividend after allowing depreciation as per Income Tax Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>