<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11734</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1980-81. The court held that the Revenue failed to establish concealment of income under the revised legal framework post a specific case law. The court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was correct, and both questions of law were answered in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11734</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1980-81. The court held that the Revenue failed to establish concealment of income under the revised legal framework post a specific case law. The court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was correct, and both questions of law were answered in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>