<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354757</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for A.Ys 2011-12 and 2012-13. The appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed based on the precedent set by the High Court of Bombay and the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the SLP. The Tribunal emphasized that the conditions for deduction under Section 80IB(10) were met, and the previous judicial decisions in favor of the assessee were binding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:34:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354757</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for A.Ys 2011-12 and 2012-13. The appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed based on the precedent set by the High Court of Bombay and the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the SLP. The Tribunal emphasized that the conditions for deduction under Section 80IB(10) were met, and the previous judicial decisions in favor of the assessee were binding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>