<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 162 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all 109 appeals filed by the assessee, finding that the reassessment proceedings were without jurisdiction due to the AO&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening assessments and lack of evidence supporting the existence of an AOP. The Tribunal quashed protective assessments and stressed the importance of complying with legal procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 162 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all 109 appeals filed by the assessee, finding that the reassessment proceedings were without jurisdiction due to the AO&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening assessments and lack of evidence supporting the existence of an AOP. The Tribunal quashed protective assessments and stressed the importance of complying with legal procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>