<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 66 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11731</link>
    <description>HC dismissed appeal challenging deletion of penalty under section 271D. Tribunal correctly upheld Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete Rs. 4,50,000 penalty imposed on assessee. Court found no mens rea established from transaction&#039;s nature and manner. No justification existed for remanding matter to Commissioner for fresh adjudication regarding reasonableness under section 273B. Penalty deletion was justified and legally correct in the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 13:14:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 66 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11731</link>
      <description>HC dismissed appeal challenging deletion of penalty under section 271D. Tribunal correctly upheld Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete Rs. 4,50,000 penalty imposed on assessee. Court found no mens rea established from transaction&#039;s nature and manner. No justification existed for remanding matter to Commissioner for fresh adjudication regarding reasonableness under section 273B. Penalty deletion was justified and legally correct in the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>