<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 142 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354721</link>
    <description>The Bench, relying on previous Tribunal decisions and the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Madras in a similar case, held that the demand for service tax on reimbursement expenses was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief if applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:32:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 142 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354721</link>
      <description>The Bench, relying on previous Tribunal decisions and the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Madras in a similar case, held that the demand for service tax on reimbursement expenses was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief if applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>