https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354719 The High Court dismissed the appeal against the acquittal of the respondents-accused under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The court upheld the trial court's decision to acquit the accused due to the lack of trustworthy evidence and witnesses for cross-examination, leading to the prosecution's failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized the importance of credible evidence in establishing guilt and gave the benefit of the doubt to the accused based on the insufficiency of proof presented. en-us Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354719 The High Court dismissed the appeal against the acquittal of the respondents-accused under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The court upheld the trial court's decision to acquit the accused due to the lack of trustworthy evidence and witnesses for cross-examination, leading to the prosecution's failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized the importance of credible evidence in establishing guilt and gave the benefit of the doubt to the accused based on the insufficiency of proof presented. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354719