https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354718 The Tribunal analyzed the Central Excise Valuation Rules regarding the valuation of job worked goods for excise duty calculation. It held that Rule 10A(iii) applied, requiring a sequential application of the Valuation Rules. As Rule 8 did not apply in the circumstances, the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants. en-us Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354718 The Tribunal analyzed the Central Excise Valuation Rules regarding the valuation of job worked goods for excise duty calculation. It held that Rule 10A(iii) applied, requiring a sequential application of the Valuation Rules. As Rule 8 did not apply in the circumstances, the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354718