<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 137 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the interest liability but dropping the penalty under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant voluntarily reversed the credit before the show cause notice, leading to the rejection of penalty for lack of tax evasion intent. The Tribunal distinguished between High Court judgments, following the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision on interest liability. The decision was rendered on January 31, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 137 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the interest liability but dropping the penalty under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant voluntarily reversed the credit before the show cause notice, leading to the rejection of penalty for lack of tax evasion intent. The Tribunal distinguished between High Court judgments, following the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision on interest liability. The decision was rendered on January 31, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>