<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 128 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of credit on welding electrodes for repair and maintenance of capital goods was unjustified. The appellants were found eligible for the credit, resulting in the setting aside of the impugned order. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants with consequential relief, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:24:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 128 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of credit on welding electrodes for repair and maintenance of capital goods was unjustified. The appellants were found eligible for the credit, resulting in the setting aside of the impugned order. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants with consequential relief, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>