<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 125 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354704</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the addition of grounds of appeal under Rule 10 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, regarding the jurisdiction of the Asst. Commissioner to file an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) when the adjudication order was issued by the Additional Commissioner. The Tribunal recognized the jurisdictional issue as a question of law and permitted the addition of grounds of appeal at the current stage for further consideration and final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 125 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354704</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the addition of grounds of appeal under Rule 10 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, regarding the jurisdiction of the Asst. Commissioner to file an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) when the adjudication order was issued by the Additional Commissioner. The Tribunal recognized the jurisdictional issue as a question of law and permitted the addition of grounds of appeal at the current stage for further consideration and final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>