<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1413 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198560</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ appeal, setting aside the order dated 04.02.2016 in W.P. No. 36494 of 2015. The matter was remitted back to the writ court to reconsider the modification petition and the writ petition on merits. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and ensuring compliance with previous court orders. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1413 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198560</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ appeal, setting aside the order dated 04.02.2016 in W.P. No. 36494 of 2015. The matter was remitted back to the writ court to reconsider the modification petition and the writ petition on merits. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and ensuring compliance with previous court orders. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>