https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198543 Territorial jurisdiction for a Section 9 arbitration petition was assessed by applying the principle that jurisdiction lies where the cause of action wholly or in part arises under Section 20(c) CPC and Article 226(2) of the Constitution. Cause of action was treated as the bundle of material facts, not evidence, and the pleaded facts showed connecting links with Delhi, including alleged execution of agreements there, purchase of stamp paper in Delhi, receipt of the award letter and invocation letters in Delhi, nomination of Delhi banks, receipt of payments in Delhi, and execution of bank guarantees from Delhi. The objection that the contracts were executed at Noida raised a factual issue and could not defeat jurisdiction at the preliminary stage. The petition was held maintainable in the Delhi High Court, subject to evidence on execution. en-us Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2018 16:36:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198543 Territorial jurisdiction for a Section 9 arbitration petition was assessed by applying the principle that jurisdiction lies where the cause of action wholly or in part arises under Section 20(c) CPC and Article 226(2) of the Constitution. Cause of action was treated as the bundle of material facts, not evidence, and the pleaded facts showed connecting links with Delhi, including alleged execution of agreements there, purchase of stamp paper in Delhi, receipt of the award letter and invocation letters in Delhi, nomination of Delhi banks, receipt of payments in Delhi, and execution of bank guarantees from Delhi. The objection that the contracts were executed at Noida raised a factual issue and could not defeat jurisdiction at the preliminary stage. The petition was held maintainable in the Delhi High Court, subject to evidence on execution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198543