https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198539 Territorial jurisdiction under the Industrial Disputes Act depends on the situs of employment, the employer's control over the workman, and a real nexus between the dispute and the territory. Where a workman was transferred from Delhi to Kanpur under the accepted terms of appointment, the Delhi office ceased to control the employment once the transfer took effect. Mere residence in Delhi or receipt of the dismissal order there did not create jurisdiction. Because the disciplinary proceedings and dismissal substantially arose at Kanpur, the Delhi Government lacked territorial jurisdiction to make the reference, and the reference order was liable to be quashed. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2018 16:12:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198539 Territorial jurisdiction under the Industrial Disputes Act depends on the situs of employment, the employer's control over the workman, and a real nexus between the dispute and the territory. Where a workman was transferred from Delhi to Kanpur under the accepted terms of appointment, the Delhi office ceased to control the employment once the transfer took effect. Mere residence in Delhi or receipt of the dismissal order there did not create jurisdiction. Because the disciplinary proceedings and dismissal substantially arose at Kanpur, the Delhi Government lacked territorial jurisdiction to make the reference, and the reference order was liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198539