<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 788 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198536</link>
    <description>A contractual forum-selection clause providing that disputes arising under the licence agreements be submitted to the competent courts of The Hague was treated as an exclusive choice of forum for suits brought by the plaintiff, even though the words &quot;alone&quot; or &quot;exclusively&quot; were absent; the Indian court therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit. An anti-suit injunction was also refused because the plaintiff failed to show that the foreign proceedings were oppressive, vexatious, or otherwise unjust, and no exceptional circumstance overriding comity and the contractual forum choice was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 15:37:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 788 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198536</link>
      <description>A contractual forum-selection clause providing that disputes arising under the licence agreements be submitted to the competent courts of The Hague was treated as an exclusive choice of forum for suits brought by the plaintiff, even though the words &quot;alone&quot; or &quot;exclusively&quot; were absent; the Indian court therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit. An anti-suit injunction was also refused because the plaintiff failed to show that the foreign proceedings were oppressive, vexatious, or otherwise unjust, and no exceptional circumstance overriding comity and the contractual forum choice was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>