https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198534 Section 25 CPC was applied to permit transfer where two suits between substantially the same parties involved common and interdependent questions of fact and law. The Court treated the power of transfer as wide and expedient where separate trials risked conflicting findings, duplication of evidence and unnecessary inconvenience. It noted that the evidence was substantially common and available at Madras, the parallel proceeding there had already reached a similar stage, and the balance of convenience favoured transfer. The request to proceed under Section 10 was not accepted, and the Seoni suit was directed to be transferred to the Madras High Court on its Original Side. en-us Thu, 03 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2018 15:28:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198534 Section 25 CPC was applied to permit transfer where two suits between substantially the same parties involved common and interdependent questions of fact and law. The Court treated the power of transfer as wide and expedient where separate trials risked conflicting findings, duplication of evidence and unnecessary inconvenience. It noted that the evidence was substantially common and available at Madras, the parallel proceeding there had already reached a similar stage, and the balance of convenience favoured transfer. The request to proceed under Section 10 was not accepted, and the Seoni suit was directed to be transferred to the Madras High Court on its Original Side. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198534