https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198531 Article 30(1) permits regulation of minority educational institutions where the measures support educational excellence, competent staffing, fair service conditions and effective administration without substantially impairing managerial control. Section 12 of the Delhi School Education Act was held discriminatory to the extent it excluded unaided minority schools from Chapter IV, because the regulatory scheme, including Sections 9, 10 and 11, could validly apply to such schools. The blanket prior approval requirement in Section 8(2) for dismissal, removal, reduction in rank or termination was treated as an impermissible intrusion, but the remaining disciplinary safeguards, including appeal to a judicially qualified Tribunal, were upheld as reasonable. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Aug 2024 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198531 Article 30(1) permits regulation of minority educational institutions where the measures support educational excellence, competent staffing, fair service conditions and effective administration without substantially impairing managerial control. Section 12 of the Delhi School Education Act was held discriminatory to the extent it excluded unaided minority schools from Chapter IV, because the regulatory scheme, including Sections 9, 10 and 11, could validly apply to such schools. The blanket prior approval requirement in Section 8(2) for dismissal, removal, reduction in rank or termination was treated as an impermissible intrusion, but the remaining disciplinary safeguards, including appeal to a judicially qualified Tribunal, were upheld as reasonable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198531