<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 182 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198524</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld an industrial tribunal award granting tiffin allowance to staff canteen employees and warm coats to selected subordinate staff, finding no reasonable basis to deny those benefits and no exceptional ground for interference under Article 136. It also sustained the direction to pay half wages for the strike and lock-out period, holding that although the strike could be illegal during pending proceedings and the lock-out initially justified, the parties&#039; subsequent conduct had to be assessed as a whole. The Court accepted the tribunal&#039;s equitable apportionment of blame and relief in aid of industrial peace, and declined to disturb the award.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 182 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198524</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld an industrial tribunal award granting tiffin allowance to staff canteen employees and warm coats to selected subordinate staff, finding no reasonable basis to deny those benefits and no exceptional ground for interference under Article 136. It also sustained the direction to pay half wages for the strike and lock-out period, holding that although the strike could be illegal during pending proceedings and the lock-out initially justified, the parties&#039; subsequent conduct had to be assessed as a whole. The Court accepted the tribunal&#039;s equitable apportionment of blame and relief in aid of industrial peace, and declined to disturb the award.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>