<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 1010 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198523</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment, ruling that the circulars regarding monetary compensation and compassionate appointments could not be applied retrospectively. The SC emphasized that the scheme for compassionate appointments was intended only for government servants and must adhere to constitutional provisions ensuring equal opportunity. The appeal was allowed, and the respondent&#039;s request for a compassionate appointment was denied, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 1010 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198523</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment, ruling that the circulars regarding monetary compensation and compassionate appointments could not be applied retrospectively. The SC emphasized that the scheme for compassionate appointments was intended only for government servants and must adhere to constitutional provisions ensuring equal opportunity. The appeal was allowed, and the respondent&#039;s request for a compassionate appointment was denied, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>