<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 106 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354685</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to verify tax residency certificates and apply the DTAA rate if applicable. DTAA provisions were held to override Section 206AA, preventing the assessee from defaulting under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) if the lower DTAA rate applied. The appeal was dismissed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s directions were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 106 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354685</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to verify tax residency certificates and apply the DTAA rate if applicable. DTAA provisions were held to override Section 206AA, preventing the assessee from defaulting under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) if the lower DTAA rate applied. The appeal was dismissed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s directions were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>