<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 93 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354672</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that &quot;sawn timber&quot; was distinct from &quot;timber&quot; under section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, all appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of the CIT(A) were allowed, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 93 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354672</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that &quot;sawn timber&quot; was distinct from &quot;timber&quot; under section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, all appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of the CIT(A) were allowed, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>