<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 82 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s services fell within the definition of air travel agency services, not business auxiliary services. The order demanding service tax on the commission earned was set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 82 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s services fell within the definition of air travel agency services, not business auxiliary services. The order demanding service tax on the commission earned was set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>