<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 80 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not liable to pay service tax before 1.6.2007 and had fulfilled their tax liability under the composition scheme for the period from 1.6.2007 to 31.3.2008. Consequently, there was no additional tax liability beyond what had already been paid. The penalty under section 78 was revoked due to the complexity of the issue. The appeal was partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 80 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not liable to pay service tax before 1.6.2007 and had fulfilled their tax liability under the composition scheme for the period from 1.6.2007 to 31.3.2008. Consequently, there was no additional tax liability beyond what had already been paid. The penalty under section 78 was revoked due to the complexity of the issue. The appeal was partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>