<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 79 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the appellants, ruling that they were not liable to pay service tax on royalty paid to foreign collaborators under Intellectual Property Right services. The Tribunal clarified that the liability to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism on commission/amounts paid to foreign agents was settled in favor of the assessees. The ruling was based on established legal interpretations and judicial precedents, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 79 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the appellants, ruling that they were not liable to pay service tax on royalty paid to foreign collaborators under Intellectual Property Right services. The Tribunal clarified that the liability to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism on commission/amounts paid to foreign agents was settled in favor of the assessees. The ruling was based on established legal interpretations and judicial precedents, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>