<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 76 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant qualified as export of Business Auxiliary Services under Rule 3(3) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The Tribunal considered the payment received in Indian Rupees as convertible foreign exchange, following precedent cases. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, allowing the appeal and granting the appellant exemption from service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 76 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant qualified as export of Business Auxiliary Services under Rule 3(3) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The Tribunal considered the payment received in Indian Rupees as convertible foreign exchange, following precedent cases. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, allowing the appeal and granting the appellant exemption from service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>